Are Women Worse at Parking?
"Women can't park a car."
Women take slightly longer to park on average and are slightly more likely to have parking-lot fender-bender incidents — but not by much, and these minor events make up a tiny share of total crash costs. Meanwhile, men cause ~71% of US traffic fatalities. If 'parking' is a gendered skill ranking, it's a narrow and low-stakes one.
What the data says
-
Observational parking study: women take ~21 seconds longer to parallel park on average (52s vs 31s) — but have slightly fewer bumper contacts.
NCP UK study (2012), widely reported · 2012 · Field observation of 700+ parkings
-
Insurance claim data shows women have slightly more minor parking-related claims by frequency; men have substantially more major claims by cost.
IIHS / Insurance Information Institute · 2024 · Claims data analysis
-
Modern parking sensors, rear-view cameras, and auto-park systems reduce most parking-skill differences to near-zero.
NHTSA vehicle safety technology reports · 2023 · Vehicle technology assessment
Where it came from
'Women can't park' sits in the 'women can't drive' cluster. It captures a small real difference in speed and amplifies it into a broad ability claim. Modern car technology has largely eliminated the underlying skill differential.
What this means
Slightly slower, slightly more cautious, slightly fewer serious incidents. The stereotype frames 'slower' as 'worse.' If you value not hitting things, reframing is warranted.
Frequently asked
Are women actually slower at parking?
On average, yes — observational studies find ~20 seconds slower for parallel parking. They also have fewer bumper contacts.
Do parking sensors close the gap?
Mostly, yes. Modern parking-assist technology reduces the skill differential to near-zero.